| 4Pi-Microscopy... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ...
provides 3D-resolution in the 100 nm range. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ernst
Abbe discovered that the focal spot size decreases with the microscope's
aperture angle i.e. with the size of the spherical wavefront that is produced
by the objective lens. But a regular objective lens, even of the largest
aperture, produces just a segment of a spherical wavefront coming from
a single direction. As a result the focal spot is longer (z) than wide
(x,y) [Fig. 1a]. By contrast, a full spherical wavefront of a solid angle
of 4π would lead to a spherical spot and hence to an improvement of
spatial resolution in the z-direction. Click on Image for enlargement! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
idea:
Since there are no lenses or mirrors that could provide such a wavefront
across a significantly large field of view, the idea behind our 4Pi-microscope
[Fig. 2] is to mimic the 'close to ideal' situation by using two opposing
objective lenses coherently, so that the two wavefronts add up and join
forces [Fig. 1b] [4, 12]. The sketch in Fig. 2 gives an idea about the
optical setup - although modern versions are more sophisticated. Allowing
the illumination wavefronts to constructively interfere in the sample
produces a main focal spot that is sharper in the z-direction by about
3-4 times (4Pi of type A). A similar improvement is obtained if the lenses
add their collected fluorescence wavefronts in a common point detector
(4Pi of type B). Doing both together is best, of course, and leads to
a 5-7-fold improvement of resolution along z (4Pi of type C) [13, 14].
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
sidelobe challenge:
If the two segments were full spherical halves, the focal spot would be
a (nearly) spherical spot, too. But since a considerable solid angle is
not provided by the lenses, interference typically spawns off 2 axial
side-lobes which, if not taken into account, lead to artefactual images.
We deal with this challenge by an appropriate mathematical filter [Fig.
1c] [15]. This filter does not require any information about the object,
apart from the height and location of the lobes. Linear filtering is possible
if the lobes are significantly less than 50% of the main sharp maximum.
This can be reliably fulfilled if multiphoton excitation of the dye is
applied [4, 15]. Linear mathematical filtering is fast and a single effective
spot is readily achieved [Fig. 1c]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Effective
resolution:
The resolution is largely given by the extent of the effective 4Pi-spot,
which is 3-5 times sharper than the spot of a regular confocal microscope.
The variation 3-5 depends on the type of implementation (Type A, B, or
C). The improvement is readily observed from the xz-images Fig. 3a and
Fig. 3b [16]. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Restoration:
By further combining 4Pi-microscopy with non-linear image restoration,
a 3D-resolution of ~100 nm is reliably achieved. The combination of 4Pi-microscopy
and non-linear image restoration leads to dramatically improved 3D-images
[Fig. 3c] [15, 17, 18]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Imaging speed: 4Pi-microscopy has recently been implemented as a fast CCD-based, beam scanning, multifocal multiphoton microscope (MMM) [19], so that image acquisition time was cut down to about 1 second/ slice. In addition the method was refined for later immersion. As a result, this microscopy technique delivered for the first time 3D-images of live cells in the 100 nm range [6]. Applications: The animated graphic shows a surface reconstructed 3D-image of the GFP-tagged mitochondrial matrix of a live budding yeast cell. Live cell 4Pi-imaging allowed us to study the influence of selected mitochondrial proteins on mitochondrial morphology [6]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||