next up previous
Next: Relevance of the Up: Molecular Dynamics of Conformational Previous: Introduction

Design of a simplified protein model

  To enable studies of low-frequency protein dynamics by extended MD-simulations of a simplified protein model, the design of that model has to meet two main requirements: (a) the model should exhibit structural and dynamical properties similar to those of real proteins, in particular, it should enable a study of conformational transitions; (b) the model should exhibit as few degrees of freedom as possible, and, accordingly, should be structurally simple. Thus, the protein model should represent a `minimal' model. Such model can not contain all features of proteins, nor can it model the dynamics of a specific protein. Therefore, we included only those structural elements, the combination of which a priori seemed to be essential for low-frequency dynamical properties.

For the design of the protein model we have chosen a two step procedure: first, we defined a `primary' structure, consisting of 100 residues, and a force field. Second, we simulated a `folding' process of that model in order to obtain a stable tertiary structure.

To optimally meet the above conflicting objectives, we decided to neglect the internal structure of the residues and to describe the polypeptide by a chain of 100 van der Waals spheres, which are linearly connected via interactions resembling chemical bonds. The employed force field included bond stretch, bond angle, van der Waals and Coulomb interactionsgif:

where the energy contributions are defined as in Ref. Brooks83. The particle masses and force parameters were those of `extended atoms' and associated single bonds, as defined in the CHARMm force field[23].

With the above definitions, the model describes a 100-alkane (`hektane') rather than a protein. Therefore, additional properties which can mimic the low-frequency behavior of proteins have to be included. In order to identify such properties we note that a characteristic feature of proteins is their ability to fold into and to maintain a unique tertiary structuregif in native environment[59]. That property is a prerequisite for their specific biochemical function. The tertiary structure is determined by specific interactions of particular amino acid side groups, e.g. by disulfide bonds or by H-bonds as well as by less specific long-range interactions like Coulomb or hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. The latter type of interaction, in particular the hydrophobic force, is known to dominantly contribute to the stability of folded proteins[60,61]. We therefore decided to add heterogeneous long-range interactions to our protein model.

Primary structure:

For that purpose we defined an artificial, heterogeneous `primary structure' by assigning different partial charges to the 100 van der Waals spheres of the model. Figure gif shows the chosen charge distribution (bold, wavy curve) along the stretched chain. As can be seen, that distribution divides the protein model into five parts, three of which carry a positive charge, while the remaining two are charged negatively. The inset of Fig. gif shows the detailed structure of the model.

  
Figure: Protein model in a stretched, unfolded configuration, consisting of 100 -like `atoms'; their partial charges are represented by the bold curve; the inset shows a zoom of the detailed structure.

The average absolute charge was chosen such that the corresponding Coulomb energy contribution becomes sufficiently large as to over-compensate entropic free energy contributions at room temperaturegif and thus to stabilize folded structures.

In that respect, the chosen Coulomb interactions mimic hydrophobic protein-solvent interactions comparable to those included into the bead-model in Ref. Honeycutt92: the attraction of oppositely charged `residues' resembles hydrophobic forces, whereas the repulsion of equally charged `residues' models the tendency of hydrophilic groups to solvate. We note, that, as a consequence of the above interpretation, the protein model comprises a simple effective solvent model.

  
Figure: Snapshots of the protein structure during the simulated folding process described in the text; structures are shown as `ribbon-plots' (a)--(f): initial, completely unfolded configuration (a); successive configurations after 3 ps (b), 6 ps (c), 7 ps (d), 8 ps (e), and 100 ps (f), respectively; (g): folded structure of the protein model after 5 ns, which was used as initial configuration for the dynamics simulations described in the text; the bold lines represent chemical bonds; four numbered circles mark atoms referred to in the text.

Folding Process:

The second step --- the `folding' of the protein model --- was carried out by means of MD-simulation. All simulations presented in this paper have been performed in vacuo using the Verlet-algorithm[36] with an integration step size of one femtosecond for the integration of the Newtonian equations of motion. No `cut-off' has been employed.

Starting from an unfolded configuration, shown in Fig. gif and, as a ribbon-plot, in Fig. gif (a), the protein model was allowed to freely move under the influence of bond-, van der Waals-, and Coulomb interactions. Figure gif (b--f) shows snapshots of the structure during this initial phase of the `folding process'. As can be seen, the compactness of the model rapidly increased and, after 10 picoseconds, came close to its final value. At this stage, the tertiary structure had not yet stabilized, and the model exhibited frequent conformational changes.

Within the first few femtoseconds of the folding process, the temperature of the model raised from 300 K to above 10,000 K. This large temperature jump is due to high conformational energy present in the initial structure, part of which quickly converted into kinetic energy. We continued this high temperature dynamics for two nanoseconds to explore configurational space. By rescaling of atomic velocities, the model was then slowly cooled down to 300 K, where it was trapped in a well-defined conformation, which remained stable during the subsequent equilibration phase of one nanosecond duration. The model was then allowed to move freely again for two nanoseconds in order to approach thermal equilibrium. This has been achieved, as is indicated by the fact that no temperature drift could be observed during that period. The resulting, folded and relaxed conformation is depicted in Fig. gif (g). This structure was used as initial configuration for the simulations described in the following Sections.



next up previous
Next: Relevance of the Up: Molecular Dynamics of Conformational Previous: Introduction



Helmut Grubmueller
Mon Nov 6 16:25:56 MET 1995